Laws are often the product of things that have happened…
Let’s explain with examples from different countries: In Denmark, a driver who sees someone under their car is forbidden from starting it. If you’re in France, kissing on a railway track is prohibited under the country’s laws. In the US, barbers are forbidden from cutting children’s ears, and throwing a snake at someone is prohibited.
Don’t laugh at these bans.
Believe me, someone in Denmark must have started their car while there was someone underneath it, and that’s why this ban was introduced. Or perhaps a French couple, from a nation famous around the world for its kissing style, were hit by a train while kissing on the railway. In the US, barbers must have often been cutting children’s ears, and everyone must have been throwing snakes at one another; that’s why these bans came about.
In other words, if something has been prohibited, you can be sure that it happened and that its harmful effects have been proven through experience.
That’s how laws come into being.
Things that happen give rise to laws, and states maintain order through those laws.
That is one of the duties of states: maintaining order…
That is why, in countries, absolute military power is under the control of the state.
The state is responsible for maintaining order and ensuring the “equality of individuals” that brings about that order.
If that is not the case, people who believe they are not treated equally rebel against the situation, and this rebellion brings “terror” within that state.
Unfortunately, this also brings about a rather unpleasant situation.
Now let’s turn to the unpleasant situation in our country!
Fortunately, we are facing a situation that does not involve physical violence, but that includes something even worse: “psychological violence.”
Those who are civil servants and those who are not…
Have the leaders of this state ever thought about how those who cannot become civil servants feel as they watch, enviously, the kingdom established by civil servants—especially when, as I mentioned above, those leaders are responsible for ensuring equality among the people?
And what about those civil servants who are constantly taking action?
What do you think those who cannot become civil servants make of this situation?
Let’s set all that aside; after all, those with connections got in, settled in, and are enjoying themselves…
But how are we to view the fact that they are public employees while also doing a second job, in violation of the law?
And what category should we put our leaders in, as they stand by and watch this system that gives those unable to become civil servants no chance at all to make a living?
How can a state whose primary duty is to maintain order allow such disorder?
How can it stand by and watch this inequality and this psychological violence, which leaves deep wounds in society?
The country has reached such a state that, almost, “not doing a second job has become against the law!”
If this practice has been banned, it must be because its consequences are bad…
Yet everyone is aware that this practice is prohibited by law, but no one lifts a finger…
And then teachers’ unions come out and complain, “They are driving us to brain drain”…
Yes, gentlemen, you’re right; but the state is doing this by granting you so many privileges, and you, by leaving no room for this country’s unemployed children to work, are forcing them to emigrate…
Hope to see you on Tuesday…
Pay attention to your surroundings, keep them clean, and be courteous in traffic!